tintoy
Well-known member
What do you prefer, a Turbo throttle body or non turbor throttle body and why? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
The Top Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Resource
Join the best E39A 1991-1992 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 community and document your GVR4 journey.
- Software Upgraded - Reset Your Password to Login
In order to log in after the forum software change, you need to reset your password. If you don't have access to the email address you used to register your GVR4.org account, you won't be able to reset your password. In that case, follow the instructions here to regain access to the forum.
throttle body
- Thread startertintoy
- Start date
pot
Staff member
I prefer the 1g non-turbo throttlebody for a couple of reasons:
- Omission of restrictive elbow
- 3 Vacuum ports as opposed to the factory 4
- Offers the most flow of either of the DSM throttlebodys
The only drawback I can think of is reconfiguration of intercooler piping, otherwise if you can locate an NT throttlebody for relatively cheap then I'd suggest to do so. However, from a performance standpoint I didn't notice much of a difference despite the CFM increase albeit I am still running a factory turbo/intercooler.
*For additional information I encourage you to visit: www.throttlebodys.com
- Omission of restrictive elbow
- 3 Vacuum ports as opposed to the factory 4
- Offers the most flow of either of the DSM throttlebodys
The only drawback I can think of is reconfiguration of intercooler piping, otherwise if you can locate an NT throttlebody for relatively cheap then I'd suggest to do so. However, from a performance standpoint I didn't notice much of a difference despite the CFM increase albeit I am still running a factory turbo/intercooler.
*For additional information I encourage you to visit: www.throttlebodys.com
Last edited:
