The Top Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Resource

Join the best E39A 1991-1992 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 community and document your GVR4 journey.

  • Software Upgraded - Reset Your Password to Login
    In order to log in after the forum software change, you need to reset your password. If you don't have access to the email address you used to register your GVR4.org account, you won't be able to reset your password. In that case, follow the instructions here to regain access to the forum.

Power Predictions, please

skivittlerjimb

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
1,440
Location
Danville, CA
9.0 - 1 compression, fresh full bottom end rebuild
880 cc injectors
Walbro 255 lph fuel pump
3G MAF
DSM Link
Brode FMIC w/2.25" piping
Heavily ported Big 16G with custom o2 housing and 38mm flapper door
Ported Evo 3 exhaust manifold
2.5" catless turbo back exhaust
stock cams (would have loved HKS 272s, but...)
stock 1G BOV
stock intake manifold
93 octane

Other, non-power related sundries- Moroso oil pan (maybe), Visteon radiator, 90 oil cooler set up

So, hopefully to be dynoed at DSG next week... who wants to guess at the wheel HP and torque numbers?
 

ktmrider

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
3,128
Location
Tempe, AZ
How much boost are ya targeting?!? Numbers will vary wildly w/o that tidbit.
Hard part will be tuning for that CR, supposedly makes adjustments very sensitive.
 

thecman02

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
917
Location
Kalamazoo,MI
stock 1g..... as in uncrushed?

If that bov isn't crushed it'll probably leak and you'll get about 17 psi and probably 250ish hp.

If it is crushed and holds fine I think you could get around 290ish WHP with a pretty good tune.
 

thecman02

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
917
Location
Kalamazoo,MI
Ohh and that's estimate from me is around 22ish psi and a top timing around 17ish, but this is just all guessing. :)
 

310hp and 285ft lbs. @ 22psi

But who cares!?

All that really matters is response, Safe WOT A/F, good cruising A/F for MPG, and no knock. Thats all I'd be really worried about.
 

Brianawd

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
2,117
Location
Portland OR,
300 on pump and 360-380 on race with the boost turned up
 

Quoting Brianawd:
300 on pump and 360-380 on race with the boost turned up



Yeah.

I have seen 16g stock CR cars make 300 so with that compression 300 should be safe and attainable.
 

skivittlerjimb

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
1,440
Location
Danville, CA
Targeting every day PSI around 18psi. The 245whp number seems low to me, but I'll defer to the knowledge base here.
Is the 16G the limiting factor most of you are looking at? IOW, would the bump up to a 20G or other sort of turbo
that flows more be a good match for the 9.0 compression? Or is it as simple as crushing the BOV to hold more boost?

I went with the higher compression to get the best throttle response possible for track and hillclimb and street use,
as for now this car will remain dual usage. Really I'm not that worried about peak power but rather safe and usable
power. This car will do a fair amount of digging out of slow corners in 2nd and 3rd gear and I want early spool,
broad torque curve, and not try to push 25+psi to do it. Still, it would be nice to have the 300whp number to hang
a hat on, but really the number is pretty immaterial.

-Jim B.
280/1000
 

thecman02

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
917
Location
Kalamazoo,MI
Well... I will say that your car will be great for what you want it to do. I'd just keep the 16g by the sounds of what you are shooting for. 300whp is a goal that can be achieved with you set up, but you will have to crank the psi up to get there. I just don't believe at that psi with all the other things in your build that you'll be able to get enough air into the engine without going to a higher pressure than 18ish psi. Mild cams like 264's won't hurt your low end torque and should raise your horsepower/VE be a decent amount. Then with the topend flowing more air the turbo doesn't have as high a psi... though it is still working harder because its got to spin faster to keep up with airflow demand.

Pretty much I would say don't worry about running high boost. As long as you have ARP headstuds/ good FMIC/ healthy 16g you should be able to hit 300whp with confidence. You might have to be around 23ish psi though.

To have large HP numbers with low boost you need lots of $$ in making your engine more efficient. Sheet metal intake manifolds... cams... porting... polishing... high rpms.... big lb/min turbos.
 

skivittlerjimb

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
1,440
Location
Danville, CA
Good knowledge. Makes sense, too. I'd wanted HKS 272s but it didn't work out and we ran out of time. After a few months of events on this set up I may step up to them still.

Alex did screw it together with ARP hardware. The Brode FMIC may be a restriction at some point but I'm doubting it will be at 300-350hp levels. I'm hopeful the trick rebuild that was done to this 16G (it used to belong to Bob in Chicago who had it fully rebuilt before selling it to me) will allow it to flow quite a bit more air than a regular Big 16g, and that the O2 housing w/38mm flapper will keep the boost creep in check. Next steps would be some valvetrain work to allow higher rpms and port work to the head, and of course I could always go bigger on the turbo, but not at the expense of quick spool. Any long term recommendations on quick-spooling, road race oriented BB turbos I can drool over for the next year or so? Would like to remain internally gated, but then now I'm stepping outside of my turbo knowledge base.

-Jim B.
280/1000
 

thecman02

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
917
Location
Kalamazoo,MI
There was a guy on the forums selling the perfect turbo you were looking for.
SBR GT-11

I was interested in it but it was low on the priority list. Fast spooling turbo, bolt on, internally gated. I myself don't know if I'd buy much from SBR though because they've had a shaky history as a distributor/manufacture.

Any 50trim in ball bearing form or around that size is about ideal for road racing I'd think... there are people with actual experience on here that can tell you though.
 

thecman02

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
917
Location
Kalamazoo,MI
Here was the post I was referring too...

FS gt-11


So when/are we going to get the hard numbers on what your car puts out?
 
Last edited:

skivittlerjimb

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
1,440
Location
Danville, CA
Survey says... 238whp 250tq at ~16psi - many thanks to DSG. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/worthy.gif

It'll be nice to see a graph if Alex has one handy. Given that this is what stock STi's usually read on this dyno, I'm pretty happy considering the relatively mild mods this car has otherwise. Not sure if Alex worked it out or not, but the modified Big 16G with Bullseye housing might be responsible for some erratic boost and also might give out a little early whereas my old, plain-jane Big 16G made pretty smooth boost right straight through redline.

Longer term plan is 3" exhaust, bigger front mount, 20G or perhaps something a bit more exotic, and HKS 272s. For now I'm going to simply be a very happy GVR4 owner, and drive her as gently as and infrequently as I can this winter. Some attention still needs to be paid to particular areas like suspension bushings, gauges, and of course getting the racing buckets and cage in, but otherwise I'm feeling like I have a nice foundation for a track, hillclimb, and hopefully Targa Newf. car some day.
 

kartorium

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
2,962
Location
ellensburg,wa
Sounds like at the 22 psi level you would have been right around what most people were guessing...somewhere at 300whp or maybe even a tad more. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Congrats, and I hope the car remains fun and quick for years to come with that new motor!
 

Get an external wastegate. That bullseye housing doesnt seal real well and wont hont consistent peak boost. Looking back at my old 16g that was likely the issue. I went to a PTE SCM5031e and loved it.
 

Quoting skivittlerjimb:
Survey says... 238whp 250tq at ~16psi - many thanks to DSG. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/worthy.gif



awsome man! congrats.. i hope to bust 300whp out of the water... kd stg3, 750's, fp race manifold, 3in tbe, @ 20psi... she hauls.
 

Brianawd

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
2,117
Location
Portland OR,
Quote:
the modified Big 16G with Bullseye housing might be responsible for some erratic boost and also might give out a little early




/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hsugh.gif You don't say. Maybe now people will learn that those housing suck balls
 

Might I ask why you only tuned for 16psi? I bet with your set up 22psi could have been very do-able on pump gas.

Good luck!
 
Support Vendors who Support the GVR-4 Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned
Top