Quote:
Quote:
i would trust the UOA from bobistheoilguy.com way more than the stuff posted on rennlist, but that's just me.
Well, I guess that's ok but Bob's fameous test of Lucas Oil Stabilizer says to me that he knows tons about oil but not much about testing. See, instead of analyzing what's going on inside the transmission, he just soups up that little point-of-sale hand cranked gear thing that Lucas has put on every auto parts store counter in America. Not the same thing. All it proves is that the stuff foams up in that environment. What happens in the real world? Is foam that bad in a gear lube situation? Well, all I know is the stuff makes my vr4 shift better. A lot better.
Same thing with this Aussie test. It may measure certain characteristics of the oil but does it really say anything about how the oil behaves in the engine? Maybe... or maybe not. I'll stick with Mobil 1... don't confuse me with facts, my mind is already made up.
Well, I wasn't referring to their testing in non-real world scenarios- plus I hate bullshit bandaid fixes like oil addatives, stop leaks, etc. It's all just more stuff I have to unfuck when I get the car from the former owner.
What i'm talking about is actual labs analyzing the oil that came out of real world motors. The magazine test looks pretty bogus to me. They test a whole group of oils, and only one has "great" results, one is marginal, and all of the other top oils are complete sh*t? Please.