The Top Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Resource

Join the best E39A 1991-1992 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 community and document your GVR4 journey.

  • Software Upgraded - Reset Your Password to Login
    In order to log in after the forum software change, you need to reset your password. If you don't have access to the email address you used to register your GVR4.org account, you won't be able to reset your password. In that case, follow the instructions here to regain access to the forum.

Alignment help

When I called the local certified "installer" to schedule the mounting and balancing of the Kuhmo 712's I bought from Tire Rack, they asked me if I needed an alignment, which I did. I had planned on having another local garage, with a new Hunter laser alignment system, do it, but this guy claimed his new, "camera"-type alignment was the latest technology, and was better than laser-alignment. So, when I dropped the car off to get the tires installed, I took the factory alignment specs, and the TSB, and he seemed to understand the process.
The car has had the tendancy to pull to the right, especially since I replaced the tierods, but now, since the alignment, it seems to wander more than I like, and finds it way to the left, into uncoming traffic, which concerns me more than pulling to the gutter. Here are the before and after alignment specs from the printout he gave me:
FRONT - INITIAL - IN DEGREES (LEFT/RIGHT)
CASTER - 2.1/2.3
CAMBER - -.4/-.7
TOE - .3/.2

FRONT - AFTER ALIGNMENT - IN DEGREES (LEFT/RIGHT)
CASTER - 2.1/2.3
CAMBER - -.4/-.6
TOE - .00/-.05

REAR - INITIAL - IN DEGREES (LEFT/RIGHT)
CAMBER - -.9/-.7
TOE - .5/.3

REAR - AFTER ALIGNMENT
CAMBER - -.9/-.7
TOE - .20/.15

If anyone has any input as to what I should tell the guy to adjust when I take it back, it would be appreciated. He actually called me to ask how I liked the alignment, but I didn't want to reply to him until after I get some input from you guys. The tires are great, and the car does handle much more neutral with the alignment, but I think it can be improved upon, especially for the $100 it cost me.
Thanks!
 

Hertz

Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2002
Messages
13,501
Location
Chicago, IL
That doesn't look too crazy. Did he give you thrust angle measurements?

I've got my last alignment printout at home, it might help, but it looks to me like yours is in much better shape. However, it doesn't look like they did much more than adjust your toe... but maybe you're in spec. Don't know.

I don't have a caster kit and my caster is way out of whack (l/r). They did a good job getting me to drive relatively straight. At least it looks like your caster is sane. If you really want it to pull straight, add more caster.
 

iceman69510

Turn Right Racing
Staff member
Joined
Mar 5, 2001
Messages
10,964
Location
Michigan
If I am reading it right, it appears you have some total toe out on the front (the minus value for the right front). This can contribute to tire nibble (front self-steering) on certain types of pavement. I think you should have 0 total toe in front, or some toe-in. No reason they can't set that correctly, as it is the only actual front measure that is adjustable.

Under braking front toe-out becomes unstable. Some like it for quick turn-in on the race track, but I don't like it for the street and Mitsubishis don't seem to either.
 

turboflanagan

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2001
Messages
2,571
Location
Peachtree Corners, Georgia, USA
Is your steering wheel straight? Are those toe #'s degree too? Looks like too much toe in for the rear and the toe should be split evenly between the two tires Lt/Rt.

I hate alignment crap!
 

quote:Originally posted by turboflanagan:
Is your steering wheel straight? Are those toe #'s degree too? Looks like too much toe in for the rear and the toe should be split evenly between the two tires Lt/Rt.

I hate alignment crap!
Yes, all readings are in degrees. The spec for the toe is -.15 to +.15 degrees. Which way is plus, and which way is minus? I think you're saying that toe out is minus, right? If I were to get them to set the toe to 0.00 degrees, or maybe slightly toed in, like +0.05, it should tend to pull straighter, right?
I do have some more information, quite a nice printout they gave me. There's something called "SAI", "Incrafted angle", and "setback", under "Secondary angles". Do any of those mean anything?
 

iceman69510

Turn Right Racing
Staff member
Joined
Mar 5, 2001
Messages
10,964
Location
Michigan
Jeff,

I don't know what "Incrafted angle" might be, but SAI is the steering axis inclination, which is a theoretical angle determined by the computer when the wheels are turned. I don't believe you can actually measure it on the car. The set back is the difference fore-aft of the two "axles" of the car, basically if one side if further forward or rearward of the other.

The toe setting will not actually make you car pull one way or the other in and of itself, but it does affect how the car reacts to other inputs like tire tread/road surface interface, grooving or ruts in the road, etc. I believe toe in is usually + and toe out is -. I would recommend toe in of 0 or plus like you mentioned. I'm used to working in mm or inches for toe not degrees, because we align the race cars with string and a tape measure in the driveway. I think front toe spec is +/- 3mm or about 1/8 inch. I usually go about half that with toe in.
 
Support Vendors who Support the GVR-4 Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned

Recent Forum Posts

Top