GalantVR4.org The Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 Forum
Galant VR-4 Forums » Galant VR-4 » Technical Discussions » Active rear toe LImiter idea
Previous thread Next thread

Active rear toe LImiter idea


prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166209 posted 04/04/14 09:50 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
I know the jays racing rear toe eliminator works very well, and welding up the front bushing to make it solid works well too, but I've been looking for a cheap and quick idea of a limiting brace that reduces the overall amount to active toe. Well I got to thinking about using a sway bar link connected from the arm to the frame somehow. I figure if a sway bar link can handle vehicle roll weight, then it should be strong enough. I think I finally found links that might work. Its a front sway bar link from a 02 nissan pathfinder. In the pics I mocked it up where the original rack tie rod would mount. As far as mounting to the frame there are two bolts for rear abs wires that could be used to mount a bracket. In a second idea I put the link on top and the link will reach perfectly to the rear sway bar mount hole. I mean it lines up perfect. You would have to remove the bolt and drill it out to mount the stud for the link. By the way that's a 25mm rear sway bar, and it seems to clear everything by at least 1/2"

I haven't done this yet, as I'm looking to start a discussion on whether this is a useful idea or won't do much. I'm only coming up with this idea as a cheaper solution to the jays racing kit and a easier way than to weld up the arm. The links can be had for under $50 at any local store too.

Pics:










Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

EMX5636
Carbon Fiber Cage
108/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166264 posted 04/04/14 04:27 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
I was going to do something like that before I did the split washer trick from a long time ago. That's why some people say it's better to block the rack off, and leave it in, rather than pulling it out. I think your idea will work, but probably won't be any easier than just welding the washers on.



91 #108/2000- link
97 Kawi ZX7R Street/Track
03 Kawi KLX400R Supermoto
01 GMC Sierra C3 AWD
05 CTS-V Stealth Grey

Posts: 1619 | From: Bucks County, PA | Member Since: 06/28/08 | IP: (69.249.135.121) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166272 posted 04/04/14 04:52 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Split washer trick?



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

89Patches
I <3 AMS


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166281 posted 04/04/14 05:32 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Ya where you would weld the toe eliminator in, you take a big washer cut in half then then just weld to the trailing arm.

Like so!


Posts: 718 | From: Ontario Canada | Member Since: 01/30/13 | IP: (174.35.243.172) | Report this post to a Moderator

EMX5636
Carbon Fiber Cage
108/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166295 posted 04/04/14 07:05 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Thanks for the pic Patches. It's really simple like that. Some people say it limits movement because the bushing wasn't designed to take twisting forces with the washer welded in (with suspension travel), but TONS of people have done it, and mine didn't feel to bind at all with the coilover disconnected and me moving the arm up and down in it's normal travel.



91 #108/2000- link
97 Kawi ZX7R Street/Track
03 Kawi KLX400R Supermoto
01 GMC Sierra C3 AWD
05 CTS-V Stealth Grey

Posts: 1619 | From: Bucks County, PA | Member Since: 06/28/08 | IP: (69.249.135.121) | Report this post to a Moderator

fuel
"Just to be pedantic!"


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166488 posted 04/07/14 06:00 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
I would be concerned the sway bar links are not adjustable as you would want some kind of adjustment to get the alignment bang on.



'91 E39A Galant VR-4 Evolution | '80 A164A Eterna GSR Turbo

-- Visit my JDM Galant VR-4 info & specifications site here! --

Posts: 2036 | From: Toronto, ON, Canada | Member Since: 02/23/09 | IP: (213.86.101.182) | Report this post to a Moderator

belize1334
well bread and nobly conceived
1334/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166544 posted 04/07/14 12:26 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
The alignment is accomplished by pulling the trailing arm forward / backward using an eccentric bolt. The tie rod accommodates this because it has a ball-joint on each end and is mounted perpendicular to the trailing arm. If you look in the FSM you'll see that there is no need to adjust the rear steering rack when aligning the vehicle so the same would be true if replacing the rack with a simple tie-rod assembly.

As far as fabbing a brace, I've thought about this a fair bit too. In my opinion the most elegant solution is a threaded pipe with brackets welded on that simulates the shape and location of the original rear steering rack. It sits on top of the rear subframe and attaches exactly the same was as the original rear rack. You choose the diameter and length of the pipe so that it accommodates OEM front tie rod ends.



Roger B. Scott
'91 Belize Green

Posts: 3295 | From: Dundee, Scotland, UK | Member Since: 11/18/03 | IP: (153.90.1.52) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166547 posted 04/07/14 12:41 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Thought about that too. Ideally it's the best idea in this form of active toe delete.

I feel that the washer method isn't very solid as there is a chunk of the bushing hanging out inside. Seems like to me that over time it will flex at the washer and possibly break. I know a lot of people are doing that, but to me it seems iffy. I'd honestly like to keep the oem "active toe" bushing for noise reduction, but the active toe must go.

Now with the straight bar, I think the cost will be much more. But it's worth looking at. It would allow for the tie rods to be adjusted like a the manual says.

I'm trying to find a "budget" idea that more members could utilize. Something that could be a long term fix. Something that doesn't involve taking the whole rear end out and taking it to a welder. Some people DD these cars and don't have the luxury of multiple cars, and deep pockets.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

EHmotorsports
Capt Fabbin Stabbin
1865/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166568 posted 04/07/14 03:42 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
I like the Idea Prove it. I am just curious as to how much tow adjustment the link will make during the suspension travel. I am sure for a street car it may not be an issue as we already have something in the back adjusting. and possibly noting big as its close to the pivot point of the arm.



click

Posts: 1266 | From: Beaverton | Member Since: 09/26/12 | IP: (24.22.46.133) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166572 posted 04/07/14 04:04 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Right, and that's why I wanted to use the original tie rod hole. I don't think there will be much toe change under compression. I wanna fab up a quick mount and take it up to the alignment rack and play with it and see the suspension arc to find out if there is much change. In my picks the car is lowered 1" in the rear already. I'm getting some ideas for a bracket that will bolt on to the two abs wire mounts. They use M8 bolts so I would think that would be enough torque on the bracket to keep it in place. I really like the bracket idea because then this becomes a full bolt on mod.

I put in rear mustache bar bushings a noted a big difference so locking down the active toe really got me interested in getting it done.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy


Edited by prove_it (04/07/14 04:06 PM)

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

EMX5636
Carbon Fiber Cage
108/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166595 posted 04/07/14 06:35 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Quoting prove_it:

I feel that the washer method isn't very solid as there is a chunk of the bushing hanging out inside. Seems like to me that over time it will flex at the washer and possibly break. I know a lot of people are doing that, but to me it seems iffy.




I can see why you would think that, but the other end of the active toe metal end is bolted in place with the vertical bolt in the trailing arm. The bushing just allows deflection at the end of the trailing arm. As long as the bolt is retained, and the weld decent on the washer, it's a permanent fix, and you still have the rubber bushing into the cradle to quiet noise and road vibration.



91 #108/2000- link
97 Kawi ZX7R Street/Track
03 Kawi KLX400R Supermoto
01 GMC Sierra C3 AWD
05 CTS-V Stealth Grey

Posts: 1619 | From: Bucks County, PA | Member Since: 06/28/08 | IP: (69.249.135.121) | Report this post to a Moderator

belize1334
well bread and nobly conceived
1334/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166683 posted 04/08/14 10:25 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Clarification: There are two bushings at the front of the trailing arm. One of them is incorporated into the mounting point and the other is inside the arm itself. The latter is what people eliminate when trying to get rid of active toe. But, the trailing arm needs to articulate in order for the wheel to travel properly through it's range of motion. That's the problem with the washer method. It doesn't allow any twist, which puts all the flexion in the front bushing and if you have poly bushings you'll get bind. The only way to eliminate active toe without getting bind is to replace the inner bushing with a sperical bearing (twist but now lateral movement) as with the JayRacing kit OR to use a tie rod to eliminate side-to-side travel while keeping the bushing in place. This allows twist and up-down flexion but not side-side flexion.

Regarding range of motion - Regardless of whether the tie rod attaches directly to the subframe or the chassis or a rack-replacement I don't see how the tie-rod method could have any negative effect of suspension travel. The changes in geometry in the front are minimal even at full droop / full compression. The tie rod basically won't move at all but it will pivot at the outer ball-joint, thereby allowing the trailing arm to twist, which is the point.



Roger B. Scott
'91 Belize Green


Edited by belize1334 (04/08/14 10:26 AM)

Posts: 3295 | From: Dundee, Scotland, UK | Member Since: 11/18/03 | IP: (216.187.191.14) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166693 posted 04/08/14 11:08 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Good info. This is why I posted the idea. I'm not an engineer so getting posts like that really help. What I would like to figure out is an estimated amount of force applied across the tie rod. I'm thinking it will handle the stress just fine, but wanna make sure the idea is fully sound before attempting.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

belize1334
well bread and nobly conceived
1334/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166733 posted 04/08/14 01:37 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Well, if the max lateral acceleration is 1 G, then the side-load on the whole wheel assembly is gonna be about 1200 lbs with all the weight on the outside wheel. Most of that is going to go onto the control arms, which are located almost, but not exactly, inboard of the contact patch. Let's say that they are an inch behind the contact patch, which is an overestimate. The trailing arm is about 2 feet long so at most the tie rod would see 60lbs during heavy cornering. Not much, but plenty to deflect the bushing (if you push on it with your hand you'll see it doesn't take much). But, much more importantly, the bushing also sees lateral forces during vehicle acceleration. Launch will be the biggest effect. Let's say you're traction limited again, with a heavy launch where all the weight is on the back wheels (an extreme example). That means each wheel is generating 1500lbs of thrust. The control arms don't allow the wheel to move left right but it can pivot as the front bushing is deflected. The ball joints for the rear control arm are roughly even with the inside edge of the tires, so 5 inches inboard of the contact patch center. The torque about this point created by the thrust is 7500lb-inch. This has to be countered by the front attachment of the trailing arm, which as we estimated is 24 inches long, so the lateral force on the front bushing is maybe 300lbs. That means that if a big heavy guy could hang from the bracket without stressing it then you're good to go. For safety, make it twice that strong and it'll never break.

Another way to look at it is to reverse engineer based on the design of the original steering rack, which was built to handle this exact stress. Clearly ball joints aren't the week point, it'll be the mounting bracket or the spot that the ball joints attach to. The original rack had tabs that were bolted to the subframe with m10(?) bolts? So if you use a bracket it should be of the same strength or higher. If you're drilling a hole to attach a ball joint then make sure that the material is at least as thick as where the ball-joint attaches to the trailing arm.



Roger B. Scott
'91 Belize Green

Posts: 3295 | From: Dundee, Scotland, UK | Member Since: 11/18/03 | IP: (216.187.191.14) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1166743 posted 04/08/14 02:17 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Well done. So yea I suppose tie rods should take the beating. Seeing how they support side to side sway of a 4000lb truck.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

SSGdave
Member
1855/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167057 posted 04/10/14 07:56 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Quoting prove_it:

Right, and that's why I wanted to use the original tie rod hole. I don't think there will be much toe change under compression. I wanna fab up a quick mount and take it up to the alignment rack and play with it and see the suspension arc to find out if there is much change. In my picks the car is lowered 1" in the rear already. I'm getting some ideas for a bracket that will bolt on to the two abs wire mounts. They use M8 bolts so I would think that would be enough torque on the bracket to keep it in place. I really like the bracket idea because then this becomes a full bolt on mod.





I Like your Thinking, you have my attention sir.



Yeah its me "SGTdave". ...and I still don't fuck around when there's work to be done.
1991 GVR4 1855/2000 - Daly Driver "Frankie"
1990 GGSX(turbo)- Project/Serious Road Race Car "Uncle Randy"

Posts: 137 | From: San Diego, CA | Member Since: 05/31/11 | IP: (143.81.0.41) | Report this post to a Moderator

vr4play
handles best on 3 tires
816/1000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167102 posted 04/10/14 01:40 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Quoting belize1334:

The alignment is accomplished by pulling the trailing arm forward / backward using an eccentric bolt. The tie rod accommodates this because it has a ball-joint on each end and is mounted perpendicular to the trailing arm. If you look in the FSM you'll see that there is no need to adjust the rear steering rack when aligning the vehicle so the same would be true if replacing the rack with a simple tie-rod assembly.




This is wrong. If you read how to do the rear alignment on one of these vehicles you will see that you must disconnect the rear tie rod from the trailing arm, adjust the rear toe, and then adjust the tie rod to fit back into the hole without changing the rear toe. You would need to be able to adjust your link if you want this to work without putting unwanted forces on parts back there. All you would need to do is cut the link and use a LH and a RH die to thread the link and put a piece of hex stock that has been internally threaded in place with some lock nuts. Problem solved. That is how we make adjustable links for race cars to eliminate sway bar pre-load.



816 of 1000
[email protected]
??? of 2000
[email protected] on 93oct
[email protected] on C16
[email protected] on E90
ASE Certified Master Technician
www.Performance-Alignment.com


Edited by vr4play (04/10/14 01:42 PM)

Posts: 396 | From: Cincinnati, Ohio | Member Since: 02/07/08 | IP: (74.215.234.86) | Report this post to a Moderator

marvinmadman
Senior Member
136/1000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167117 posted 04/10/14 05:27 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
^ correct



1982/2000 sold
1263/2000 parts
136/1000 work n progress
08 ZX14
10 Ford Flex TT/AWD
05 Galant GTS

Posts: 2348 | From: Lafayette, Louisiana | Member Since: 11/10/03 | IP: (2600:100d:b106:1) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167153 posted 04/10/14 11:37 PM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Quoting vr4play:

Quoting belize1334:

The alignment is accomplished by pulling the trailing arm forward / backward using an eccentric bolt. The tie rod accommodates this because it has a ball-joint on each end and is mounted perpendicular to the trailing arm. If you look in the FSM you'll see that there is no need to adjust the rear steering rack when aligning the vehicle so the same would be true if replacing the rack with a simple tie-rod assembly.




This is wrong. If you read how to do the rear alignment on one of these vehicles you will see that you must disconnect the rear tie rod from the trailing arm, adjust the rear toe, and then adjust the tie rod to fit back into the hole without changing the rear toe. You would need to be able to adjust your link if you want this to work without putting unwanted forces on parts back there. All you would need to do is cut the link and use a LH and a RH die to thread the link and put a piece of hex stock that has been internally threaded in place with some lock nuts. Problem solved. That is how we make adjustable links for race cars to eliminate sway bar pre-load.





You can still set the toe with the link being solid. I do see your point about pre-loading the link. You did mention the word racecar too. I think locking in the rear active toe will make a bigger difference than having one side more loaded than the other. You could if you wanted to thread them, but I don't think that it is necessary for a dd car. It could help the joints last longer, perhaps.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (216.16.106.42) | Report this post to a Moderator

belize1334
well bread and nobly conceived
1334/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167178 posted 04/11/14 09:56 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Although having them threaded and read to go would allow for inconsistencies in individual vehicle geometry. How about a "kit" that involves two front outer tie-rod ends and a threaded rod to go between them. They'd both be right hand thread so adjustment would be limited to increments of a single turn, but that's still 1/16" precision or so...



Roger B. Scott
'91 Belize Green

Posts: 3295 | From: Dundee, Scotland, UK | Member Since: 11/18/03 | IP: (216.187.191.14) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167189 posted 04/11/14 11:27 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Are you talking about linking the arms together and having a faux rack?



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

SSGdave
Member
1855/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167260 posted 04/12/14 04:42 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Quote:

Are you talking about linking the arms together and having a faux rack?





Ahhh, Like and adjustable lateral rod of sorts. Like on a Solid Rear axle car!

hmmm... but I think it would still have to be two independent bars. Somthing like that would essentially be a second sway bar mounted further up.
I do like your thinking though!



Yeah its me "SGTdave". ...and I still don't fuck around when there's work to be done.
1991 GVR4 1855/2000 - Daly Driver "Frankie"
1990 GGSX(turbo)- Project/Serious Road Race Car "Uncle Randy"


Edited by SSGdave (04/15/14 06:59 AM)

Posts: 137 | From: San Diego, CA | Member Since: 05/31/11 | IP: (143.81.0.41) | Report this post to a Moderator

prove_it
my racist jokes aren't actually funny
715/1000
1284/2000


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1167460 posted 04/14/14 08:23 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
I did originally think of using two spherical ball joints with a threaded rod. But once I realized how short it would be versus the cost of 4 joints, 2 bars, and all the boots, I figured the cost would be around 100-150 for quality parts. Plus you still need a bracket fabbed up. That's when I started looking at sway bar links. I work as a tech and see different makes and models daily so I knew it was only a matter of time til I found a decent looking one.



#1284/2K NB, Totaled
#715/1K KG, Rebuilding
02 Acura TL daily duty unit

12yr+ Vr4 owner.
Honda/Acura master tech.
Family Guy

Posts: 4201 | From: Sioux Falls, SD | Member Since: 07/04/08 | IP: (24.230.93.110) | Report this post to a Moderator

kumfasa
Member


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1231209 posted 08/23/16 04:20 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post      
Bringing this back from the dead. Did you ever go ahead with the nissan sway bar links?

Has anyone used the 3sx kit arms? Do they fit our gvr4's?

$195 for the Jay Racing eliminator plus complete control arm removal and welding, it goes in the too hard basket for me.

$119 for the 3sx kit seems do-able as long as it fits. I haven't been able to source the individual parts to make the arms for under $119

Nissan sway bar links at $50 a pair. Seems great if they fit without interference.

Posts: 117 | From: Tauranga, New Zealand | Member Since: 02/28/15 | IP: (58.28.212.87) | Report this post to a Moderator

tektic
Senior Member


Galant VR-4 org Post #: 1231282 posted 08/26/16 10:23 AM     Remind Me!  Send Private Message   Edit Post   
Got picture of proposed 240 setup?


Edited by tektic (08/26/16 10:26 AM)

Posts: 1366 | From: ronkonkoma, ny | Member Since: 12/19/12 | IP: (74.71.70.250) | Report this post to a Moderator


Pages: 1 | 2
Previous thread Next thread

Extra information
0 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Galant VR4.org Moderator:  curtis, steve, atc250r, jcgalntvr4-244, cheekychimp, jepherz, Rausch, toybreaker 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 3463

Rate this thread


News & Events: News | Events
Galant VR-4: Newbies | General VR4 Discussions | Technical Discussions | How To and Info Archive
Marketplace: Parts For Sale | Cars For Sale | Good Guys | Bad Guys
Community: Members' Showcase

Contact Us | Privacy statement GalantVR-4.org

Generated in 0.145 seconds in which 0.054 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Turbo powered.



Hertz's Galant VR-4 Page